Examining My Biases Toward Social Media
This may be the teacher in me, but I find myself in the habit of examining my biases. As an educator, examining biases and practicing self-reflection are important aspects of culturally responsive teaching—where educators adjust instruction in culturally and linguistically responsive ways in order to acknowledge and accommodate what learners bring into the learning environment. As an educator, when I design lessons and activities, I try to think about the biases I have and how my perspectives may affect my students. I need to make sure that the learning takes into consideration their academic, linguistic and cultural backgrounds and design learning that collects their prior knowledge about a topic and is relevant to them. I believe there is some value in applying culturally responsive practices to instructional design as well, so if your curious, check out 5 Culturally Responsive Teaching Strategies.

I have seen a room full of people on their phones and thought the same thing..
“We are disconnected,” “this is not community,” “everyone is isolated on their phones,” “what about having real conversations and acknowledging others who are right in front of us.”
Have these thoughts, or similar thoughts, ever popped into your head? Our experiences influence the way we perceive and feel toward something and in this case, I believe my limited experiences with social media have not demonstrated the opportunities social media offers to connect and engage with each other.
I used to think…
People on their phones were isolating themselves from social connection and reality and that people are hooked on and ‘glued’ to their gadgets.
Now I think…
“People are not hooked on their gadgets—they are hooked on each other” (Rainie and Wellman, 2012, p. 6). While the type of connection and the space in which the connections are occurring has changed, individuals are still connecting. Even if it is texting, tweeting, commenting—it is conversation and it is communicating.
I used to think...
Connecting online is limiting and less personal than having an in-person conversation or attending a social group.
Now I think...
I believe a lot of my biases stem from not understanding how complex and diverse social media can be and what it has become now. Rainie and Wellman (2012) state that “many meet their social, emotional and economical needs by tapping into sparsely knit networks of diverse associates rather than relying on tight connections to a relatively small number of core associates” (p.12). The different social network that has emerged—the networked operating system (Rainie and Wellman, 2012, p. 9)—offers more diverse connections that allow individuals to engage in ways they were not previously possible before. People can also reach a population or network of people that are geographically dispersed. The variety and diversity of this networked operating system allows users choice to meet their specific social needs and at more flexible times. It’s like a glorified digital community centre catalogue, you choose what network you want to join and when you will connect and to what extent you will participate. This is the opposite of limiting, it's liberating.
I used to think...
Being a part of multiple social networks can be taxing—both socially and sometimes emotionally depending on the content or conversations we are engaging in. I experience the social taxing nature of social media—multiple Facebook messages to respond to, or the overload of valuable information posted on LinkedIn that I feel I need to act on or do something with. Sometimes, belonging to professional groups can add a new level of extra work—because there is always something to improve upon or learn.
Now I think...
This continues to be the reality of many social media users and the demands remain a potential stressor of social media. However, Rainie and Wellman (2012) share that now people tend to have more social ties and these can be reached easily with technology and managed with effective time and attention allocation (10).
My favourite part of the process of examining my biases is seeing how they are already dispelling themselves as I read, learn and experience social media in different contexts. My definitions of social media and how I understand it are changing and the beliefs I held going into my learning are being shaped, remodelled, erased or even thrown right out the window.
References
Burnham, K. (2020, July 31). 5 Culturally responsive teaching strategies. https://www.northeastern.edu/graduate/blog/culturally-responsive-teaching-strategies/
Rainie, L. & Wellman, B. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. The MIT Press.
Very interesting post Lissa. I must admit, my thinking on the matter has evolved in much the same way. Through my own experiences and talking with friends and family, I've come to realize the benefits of social media in keeping people connected, especially those that have fewer options for connection with like-minded people due to location. One important caveat I would add is that we must be careful not to neglect those we are closest to by engaging in social media too much. For example, I had a habit of scrolling through my phone, texting, engaging in FB conversations etcetera when I would go out with my partner, neglecting important dinner conversations. I didn't understand how annoying he found this until we had a discussion later. Now I keep my phone off during family time.
ReplyDeleteHi Lauren,
DeleteI agree with that sentiment too. Sometimes in social settings, it is easy or even habit perhaps, to reach for our phones. As an introvert, I have to actively think about not reaching for my phone whenever there is an awkward pause or quiet moment. Finding a balance is key!